| Virus Name | Simian Virus 40 |
| Virus Short Name | SV40 |
| Order | Unassigned |
| Virus Family | Polyomaviridae |
| Virus Subfamily | N.A. |
| Genus | Betapolyomavirus |
| Species | Simian virus 40 |
| Host | Mammals, human |
| Cell Tropism | N.A. |
| Associated Disease | N.A. |
| Mode of Transmission | N.A. |
| VIPR DB link | N.A. |
| ICTV DB link | https://talk.ictvonline.org/ictv-reports/ictv_9th_report/dsdna-viruses-2011/w/dsdna_viruses/129/polyomaviridae |
| Virus Host DB link | N.A. |
| Paper Title | SV40 utilizes ATM kinase activity to prevent non-homologous end joining of broken viral DNA replication products |
| Author's Name | Gregory A. Sowd, Dviti Mody, Joshua Eggold, David Cortez, Katherine L. Friedman, Ellen Fanning |
| Journal Name | PLOS Pathogens |
| Pubmed ID | 25474690 |
| Abstract | Simian virus 40 (SV40) and cellular DNA replication rely on host ATM and ATR DNA damage signaling kinases to facilitate DNA repair and elicit cell cycle arrest following DNA damage. During SV40 DNA replication, ATM kinase activity prevents concatemerization of the viral genome whereas ATR activity prevents accumulation of aberrant genomes resulting from breakage of a moving replication fork as it converges with a stalled fork. However, the repair pathways that ATM and ATR orchestrate to prevent these aberrant SV40 DNA replication products are unclear. Using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and Southern blotting, we show that ATR kinase activity, but not DNA-PK(cs) kinase activity, facilitates some aspects of double strand break (DSB) repair when ATM is inhibited during SV40 infection. To clarify which repair factors associate with viral DNA replication centers, we examined the localization of DSB repair proteins in response to SV40 infection. Under normal conditions, viral replication centers exclusively associate with homology-directed repair (HDR) and do not colocalize with non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) factors. Following ATM inhibition, but not ATR inhibition, activated DNA-PK(cs) and KU70/80 accumulate at the viral replication centers while CtIP and BLM, proteins that initiate 5 to 3 end resection during HDR, become undetectable. Similar to what has been observed during cellular DSB repair in S phase, these data suggest that ATM kinase influences DSB repair pathway choice by preventing the recruitment of NHEJ factors to replicating viral DNA. These data may explain how ATM prevents concatemerization of the viral genome and promotes viral propagation. We suggest that inhibitors of DNA damage signaling and DNA repair could be used during infection to disrupt productive viral DNA replication. |
| Used Model | BSC40 and U2OS cells |
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004536 |
